Thailand Should Take Advantage from the Projects
For example, says Joel Feldman, managing director of Akando Co Ltd, why shouldn't developers be grateful to make their projects promote the wider society?
Akando is constructing 275 out of 700 flats at FP Condominium in Lat Phrao Soi 48 for the UK-based Lizmans Property Fund. And, in spite of the disagreement with his own financial interest, he would prefer to observe such developments adding significance to their cities.
"Honestly, that is what the administration should make certain. It shouldn't be about trying to satisfy developers and to let them make their earnings. If they can't make their earnings then they don't do it,'' he says.
In London a developer cannot get planning permission for any project over 14 units without a transaction in social housing for key workers like firefighters, police officers, schoolteachers and nurses. For the reason that workers in these professions cannot have enough money for the city's property prices, the British government has gratified developers to participate in a subsidized scheme.
''The key worker is permitted to pay money for a shared ownership with the government having 50% of it. It's a lower price although it's still done to the necessary quality and conditions,'' he says.
Mr Feldman also sees a useful comparison with the UK in the advancement of the Thames and the Chao Phraya rivers. ''If you stare at the Docklands, South Bank and all the way up the [Thames] river this time they have made an astonishing renewal,'' he says.
Unsurprisingly, Mr Feldman is also eager on protecting old buildings. In his outlook, preservation orders should be extended to take in the modest buildings that uphold Thai traditions. Mr Feldman adds that he sees no cause why buildings in Thailand should be estimated to last only 15-20 years.
Labels: Building, condominium, developer
|
